Politics
BJP Minister calls Rahul Gandhi a ‘hybrid, son of a Muslim father, Christian mother’
Union Minister Ananth Kumar Hegde has called Congress President Rahul Gandhi a ‘hybrid’ as he believes that he is a son of a Muslim father and a Christian mother.
Hegde, who is not new to controversies, added that will Gandhi, who calls himself a ‘Janedhari Hindu’, give DNA proof that he is a Brahmin (high caste Hindu).
#WATCH: Union Minister Ananth Hegde says on Rahul Gandhi, “They want proof of surgical strikes even when whole world acknowledged it. This Muslim who calls himself a ‘janeudhari Hindu’, son of a Muslim father & a Christian mother, does he have proof that he is a Hindu”? (10.3.19) pic.twitter.com/FWXFky5jXH
— ANI (@ANI) March 11, 2019
While slamming Congress leaders for asking proof for the IAF strikes in Pakistan’s Balakot, Hegde said, “They want proof of the strikes when the whole world, including the US has acknowledged it.”Continuing his attack on Rahul Gandhi, he added, “When Rajiv Gandhi died, there were bits of his body. DNA testing had to be done. Sonia Gandhi said take samples of Priyanka not Rahul. This is on record. So this hybrid person is asking for proof.”
Recently,
Recently, Congress accused Modi of ‘politicizing terror’, and asked BJP to come clean on number of casualties caused due to the IAF strikes in Balakot, Pakistan.
The tensions between India and Pakistan countries have escalated following the Pulwama attack on a CRPF convoy in Jammu and Kashmir, which killed 49 CRPF personnel and which was claimed by militant outfit Jaish-e-Mohammad.
Following the attack, the Foreign Secretary of India had said on Tuesday that they have ‘struck the biggest camp of Jaish-e-Mohammed in Balakot in the pre-dawn ‘preemptive strikes across the Line of Control’.
ALSO READ: Better sense must prevail, we should sit down and talk: Pak PM Khan to India
“India struck the biggest camp of Jaish-e-Mohammed in Balakot and a large number of terrorists, trainers, senior commanders and groups of jihadis planning terror strikes were eliminated,” Foreign Secretary Vijay Gokhale had said.
Gokhale had added that India’s “non-military preemptive action” was specifically targeted at the Jaish-e-Mohammed camp.
“Credible intelligence was received that Jaish-e-Mohammed was attempting another suicide terror attack in various parts of the country and Fidayeen jihadis were being trained for this purpose,” he had said.
“India has given proof many times seeking action against Jaish-e-Mohammed and others at terror camps so big, that they can train hundreds of jihadis and terrorists at any given time. But due to Pakistan’s inaction, this step was necessary and had to be taken,” he had said.
Earlier, India has said that they carried out a pre-dawn strike on a ‘militant camp’ across the Line of Control soon after Pakistan army said that Indian fighter jets were forced to leave after they crossed the LoC in Muzaffarabad sector.
ALSO READ: What happened in a Budgam village when IAF aircraft crashed
According to reports, the strike was carried out at around 3:30 Tuesday morning by 12 Mirage 2000 fighter jets. The aircraft dropped, according to reports, ‘1,000 kg laser-guided bombs on a major militant camp across the Line of Control, completely destroying it’, news agency ANI reported, quoting Air Force sources.
Earlier, Pakistan Army claimed that the Indian military planes “intruded” from the Muzaffarabad sector but were forced to go back after Pakistan Air Force “immediately scrambled”.
Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan during a joint Parliament session on Thursday said that as a gesture of peace, they would return captured Indian pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan to India.
ALSO READ: Despite war hashtags and aggressive newsrooms, #SayNoToWar trends
He further stated that he was ready for talks with India and de-escalate tensions between both countries.
During the session, he said that the reason of escalation between India and Pakistan was the Kashmir dispute.
“All of this is because of Kashmir,” PM Khan said while addressing a joint session of parliament.
“I want to ask the Indian public about all that has happened over the past 4 years. There is an indigenous movement in Kashmir. At one point, Kashmiri leaders had not wanted separation, but because of Indian brutality, today all they demand is independence.”
